[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080504072114.GB15315@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date: Sun, 4 May 2008 09:21:14 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix rebuild of wakeup.bin
On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 09:41:49PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 08:06:12PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Add wakeup.lds to list af targets to avoid rebuilding wakeup.bin -
> > > > > from Roland McGrath.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for fixing this!
> > > >
> > > > Ingo, please merge.
> > >
> > > applied - thanks all!
> >
> > Just a note - I do not think this solves the problem Daniel has
> > reported with respect to first build of -next. I am awaiting more data
> > before I can analyse it further.
>
> yeah, i suspected that - that appears to be a race of some sort, i.e. a
> missing dependency coupled with parallelizable rules, not an over-eager
> dependency as fixed by this patch, right?
In the end it should be fixed by this patch.
It turned out to be a user rights issue where I assume
wakeup-lds were owned by root because we created it
despite have a fully build kernel.
This also explains why we did not see more reports on the subject.
So please push this fix towards linus soonish.
Thanks,
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists