[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080504081145.GG5838@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>
Date: Sun, 4 May 2008 11:11:45 +0300
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kconfig - a suggestion how to fix the select issue
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 09:10:41AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>...
>
> config A
> bool "a"
>
> config B
> bool "b"
> depends on A
>
> config C
> bool "c"
> require B
>
> The require dependency will have impact on visibility.
> C shall only be visible if all symbols it require are
> visible. Note that visible does not imply 'chosen'.
> In this case C would be visible when A is chosen.
>
> When the user then choose C and B is not chosen
> then the user is prompted to choose B.
>
> So user has to chose B in order to have C chosen.
>...
> Comments?
Given:
config A
tristate "a"
config B
tristate "b"
depends on A
config C
bool "c"
require B
CONFIG_A=m
Will C be visible?
The underlying problem is that we use bool for two different cases:
- non-modular driver (answer would be "no")
- enable feature in driver (answer would be "depends on the value of D")
> Sam
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists