[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 14:32:22 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: hch@...radead.org
CC: miklos@...redi.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hch@...radead.org,
viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, menage@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [patch 03/15] cgroup: dont call vfs_mkdir
> > From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
> >
> > cgroup_clone() calls vfs_mkdir() to create a directory in the cgroup
> > filesystem. Replace with explicit call to cgroup_mkdir() and
> > fsnotify_mkdir().
> >
> > This is equivalent, except that the following functions are not called
> > before cgroup_mkdir():
> >
> > - may_create()
> > - security_inode_mkdir()
> > - DQUOT_INIT()
> >
> > Permission to clone the cgroup has already been checked in
> > copy_namespaces() (requiring CAP_SYS_ADMIN). Additional file system
> > related capability checks are inappropriate and confusing.
> >
> > The quota check is unnecessary, as quotas don't make any sense for
> > this filesystem.
>
> Looks correct but I don't think it's a good idea. Spreading more logic
> into filesystems without a good reason is rarely a good idea.
(Thanks for the review, Christoph)
Agreed completely, but vfs_* aren't for filesystems to call, rather
for entities calling _into_ filesystems from the outside. This is
actually a very rare thing, so adding some extra logic for the sake of
cleanliness should be OK.
Now it can be argued, that cgroup_clone() is calling into the
filesystem from the outside. But it's not really doing that, rather
it's making an internal modification to a specific filesystem,
triggered by some external action.
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists