linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i386: Execute stack overflow warning on interrupt stack II

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 5 May 2008 16:42:24 +0300
From:	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	"Andi Kleen" <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, sandeen@...deen.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386: Execute stack overflow warning on interrupt stack II

Hi Andi,

On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
>  > Err, it checks the process stack when 4KSTACKS=n
>
>  Ok then please add the two changes if you feel strongly about that
>  (to the latest version I sent).
>
>  You always edit my patches anyways (usually driving me crazy when I have
>  dependent patches because nothing applies anymore when all the variables
>  got renamed like you often do) so I don't see any reason why you can't
>  do that here.

Heh, do you mean to say that all this time I should have just asked
Andrew to fix all the patches I've submitted rather take the trouble
to do that myself after the review? ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/