lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 09:17:30 -0700 From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com> To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> Cc: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <sven@...bigcorporation.com>, Remy Bohmer <linux@...mer.net>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> Subject: Re: Preempt-RT patch for 2.6.25 On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 14:45 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 2 May 2008, Sven-Thorsten Dietrich wrote: > > > > > > His bi-sectability changes are pretty key, and I would like to see those > > reviewed and incorporated, even if they apply only to x86. > > They would be nice, but I'm also in the process of moving patches around > to have the next mainline enhancement up front. Not sure what that has to do with bisect changes? > > > > The RT patch queue generally is a mess today. > > Lots of stuff needs to be folded down into the core patches. > > I'm starting to fold patches together too. You really want bisection first. The reason is that you don't want ever growing patches, you want smaller and smaller patches. For instance the rt-mutex-core.patch is way too large, you wouldn't want to fold my PICK_FUNCTION changes into that patch since that would just make rt-mutex-core larger .. Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists