linux-kernel - Re:Possible GPL violation in Linux-based IPTV set top box

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 5 May 2008 21:26:45 +0200
From:	"Roland" <devzero@....de>
To:	<bluethegrappler@...il.com>
Cc:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re:Possible GPL violation in Linux-based IPTV set top box

thanks for bringing this up !

i think this should be a better place to go:

http://www.gpl-violations.org/  -> 
http://www.gpl-violations.org/mailinglists.html

regards
roland



List:       linux-kernel
Subject:    Re: Possible GPL violation in Linux-based IPTV set top box
From:       Arjan van de Ven <arjan () infradead ! org>
Date:       2008-05-05 4:40:17
Message-ID: 20080504214017.2de2d220 () infradead ! org
[Download message RAW]

On Sun, 4 May 2008 23:47:24 -0400
Robert Kelly III <bluethegrappler@...il.com> wrote:

> The company I work for, SkyAngel, has recently swapped from satelite
> broadcast to IPTV. The set top box we are using runs Linux according
> to NeuLion, our partner company who supplies the STB. When we
> distribute the set top boxes, however, there is no disclaimer of
> warranty, copy of the GPL, offer for source code, or any mention of
> Linux as far as I can find. Isn't this a violation of the GPL and
> your copyright? I have raised concerns about the situation, but
> everyone here seems convinced it is somehow ok.
>
> What should be done about this? I am not sure who would be
> responsible as it seems NeuLion or some associate makes the STB and
> takes care of the software, but we sell it to our customers. Is there
> any possible way I might have missed that this could actually be
> permissible?

you should ask a lawyer, not here; your question is offtopic for this
list... there's no lawyers here.

Or if that's a really big step, you could ask Harald Welte or the
Software Freedom Law Center; both have a lot of experience with this
sort of thing.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/