[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080506154830.aa7e1b2d.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 15:48:30 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Andreas Mohr <andi@...as.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.26-rc1
Hi Ingo,
On Tue, 6 May 2008 02:17:52 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> * Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> > This was discovered in linux-next and a patch posted on March 28 ...
>
> hm, i do searches on lkml before posting patches but i cannot do
> searches on _every_ mailing list where patches might show up. There's
> just 30 hours in a day ;-)
They were both posted on lkml ... and I do appreciate your efforts.
> perhaps linux-next should propagate all add-on fix patches it is
> carrying against subsystem trees if they are still relevant to -git,
> once the subsystem tree goes to -git, and re-post them to lkml in that
> case, to avoid duplicative work? Once it's on lkml i think most
> subsystem maintainers will find any missing patches.
See above and what you quoted below.
> > I (and I assume Andrew) have been carrying them since then but noone
> > took them up. I guess (as Andrew pointed out to me) I should have
> > pushed them.
>
> yeah.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists