[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080506150213.AC63.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 15:03:52 +0900
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: on CONFIG_MM_OWNER=y, kernel panic is possible.
> That is not possible. If you look at where mm_update_next_owner() is called
> from, we call it from
>
> exit_mm() and exec_mmap()
>
> In both cases, we ensure that the task's mm has changed (to NULL and the new mm
> respectively), before we call mm_update_next_owner(), hence c->mm can never be
> equal to p->mm.
if so, following patch is needed instead.
---
fs/exec.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: b/fs/exec.c
===================================================================
--- a/fs/exec.c 2008-05-04 22:57:09.000000000 +0900
+++ b/fs/exec.c 2008-05-06 15:40:35.000000000 +0900
@@ -735,7 +735,7 @@ static int exec_mmap(struct mm_struct *m
tsk->active_mm = mm;
activate_mm(active_mm, mm);
task_unlock(tsk);
- mm_update_next_owner(mm);
+ mm_update_next_owner(old_mm);
arch_pick_mmap_layout(mm);
if (old_mm) {
up_read(&old_mm->mmap_sem);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists