[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18464.134.236488.251879@notabene.brown>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 16:53:58 +1000
From: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...il.com>
Cc: linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
paul.clements@...eleye.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] md: avoid fullsync if a faulty member missed a dirty transition
On Wednesday April 2, snitzer@...il.com wrote:
> resync via bitmap if faulty's events+1 == bitmap's events_cleared
>
> For more background please see:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-raid&m=120703208715865&w=2
>
> Without this change validate_super() will prevent the previously faulty
> member from recovering via bitmap, e.g.:
I can't help thinking that you are misinterpreting something. I don't
think there is a clean->dirty transition happening here.
You could confirm this by using --examine on both devices after the
messy shutdown and before re-assembling the array.
Even allowing for that possible confusion, I cannot quite see what is
going on.
It is fairly clear from the event counts that the NBD device is marked
clean, but if this is happening at array-shutdown time, I cannot see
why md would try to write to the NBD device and thereby detect an
error...
Do you have an internal bitmap or a bitmap in an external file?
In general, I would not like to make decisions based on the
oddness/evenness of the event counter. I consider that to be an
internal implementation detail. I am happy to make decisions based on
a difference-of-1. I need to understand the big picture first though.
NeilBrown
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists