[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <482017C3.2070508@seznam.cz>
Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 10:33:07 +0200
From: Michal Simek <monstr@...nam.cz>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, microblaze-uclinux@...e.uq.edu.au,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Will Newton <will.newton@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, git@...inx.com,
John Williams <john.williams@...alogix.com>,
Stephen Neuendorffer <stephen.neuendorffer@...inx.com>,
John Linn <John.Linn@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: microblaze syscall list
Hi hpa,
>>
>> /* kernel/sys_ni.c */
>> .long sys_ni_syscall /* :-) */
>>
>
> There is a school of thought that it's useful to reserve a system call
> number (usually zero) as a system call that is *guaranteed* to have no
> effect.
I like your opinion. I'll add it like zero syscall.
Thanks,
M
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists