[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080506112505.GA2359@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 14:25:05 +0300
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc] the kernel workflow & trivial "global -> static" patches
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 01:13:01PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 02:21:31AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
>...
> >> I could see some advantage from static in future compiler versions
> >> though from better optimization, but it's quite remote.
> >> ...
> >
> > The best case I've actually seen in practice was a variable I made
> > static, and with CONFIG_DEBUG_FOOBAR=n gcc was now able to prove that
> > the value never changed resulting in the variable plus quite a chunk
> > of code no longer emitted.
>
> Sounds like the variable should just have been removed then in the source?
No, an #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FOOBAR guarded some sysctl that allows users
to change the value.
(I'm not claiming this was a common case.)
> -Andi
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists