[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080506180527.GA8315@sergelap.austin.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 13:05:27 -0500
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: Nadia Derbey <Nadia.Derbey@...l.net>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, cmm@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] Scaling msgmni to the amount of lowmem
Quoting Luck, Tony (tony.luck@...el.com):
> > Well, this printk had been suggested by somebody (sorry I don't remember
> > who) when I first submitted the patch. Actually I think it might be
> > useful for a sysadmin to be aware of a change in the msgmni value: we
> > have the message not only at boot time, but also each time msgmni is
> > recomputed because of a change in the amount of memory.
>
> If the message is directed at the system administrator, then it would
> be nice if there were some more meaningful way to show the namespace
> that is affected than just printing the hex address of the kernel structure.
>
> As the sysadmin for my test systems, printing the hex address is mildly
> annoying ... I now have to add a new case to my scripts that look at
> dmesg output for unusual activity.
>
> Is there some better "name for a namespace" than the address? Perhaps
> the process id of the process that instantiated the namespace???
I agree with Tony here. Aside from the nuisance it is to see that
message on console every time I unshare a namespace, a printk doesn't
seem like the right way to output the info. At most I'd say an audit
message.
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists