| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4820B64D.4000805@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 12:49:33 -0700 From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com> To: Kevin Winchester <kjwinchester@...il.com> CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> Subject: Re: linux-next: WARNING: at kernel/panic.c:375 __stack_chk_test+0x50/0x54() Kevin Winchester wrote: > Arjan van de Ven wrote: >> \ >>> Does that help? >> >> somewhat. If you still have your source tree, can you do >> >> make kernel/panic.s and send that file to me as well? >> (offlist is fine) >> > > I didn't have the source tree around, but I created the tree+config, and > here is what I get (I believe it is not too big for the list): > interesting; somehow gcc does NOT put stack-protector in place despite it being told so with -fstack-protector-all. # -fno-common -funit-at-a-time -fstack-protector -fstack-protector-all # -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -fno-omit-frame-pointer # -fno-optimize-sibling-calls -fverbose-asm -fstack-protector # -fstack-protector this is weird; something is adding ANOTHER -fstack-protector to the (effective) gcc flags.. which might be overriding the -fstack-protector-all setting. I wonder if this is a distro special ;( -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists