[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805061302080.32269@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 13:06:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...glemail.com>,
Hans Rosenfeld <hans.rosenfeld@....com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix PAE pmd_bad bootup warning
On Tue, 6 May 2008, Hugh Dickins wrote:
>
> Fix Hans' good observation that follow_page() will never find pmd_huge()
> because that would have already failed the pmd_bad test: test pmd_huge in
> between the pmd_none and pmd_bad tests. Tighten x86's pmd_huge() check?
> No, once it's a hugepage entry, it can get quite far from a good pmd: for
> example, PROT_NONE leaves it with only ACCESSED of the KERN_PGTABLE bits.
I'd much rather have pdm_bad() etc fixed up instead, so that they do a
more proper test (not thinking that a PSE page is bad, since it clearly
isn't). And then, make them dependent on DEBUG_VM, because doing the
proper test will be more expensive.
Hmm?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists