[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080506230954.6e034cba@core>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 23:09:54 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: "Yigal Sadgat" <YSadgat1@...e.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
<jwboyer@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, <joern@...fs.org>
Subject: Re: Compact Flash Question
> (1) Can you really ignore bit(2) (CORR) in the Status register offset 7 that
> tells
> you that the CF has detected and corrected a soft error?, etc.
I guess it might be interesting to log the error rate but we don't
currently do that. A corrected error is just that however - corrected by
the card itself.
> (2) An engineer at SanDisk Engineering told me NOT to do wear leveling.
> The file allocation table is written very frequently back into the flash. So
> is it really safe to assume that I don't need wear leveling???
Depends on your hardware vendor. Wear management is done within the CF
card and only the hardware vendor can tell you what they do.
> (3) Re. the BUSY bit in the status register (offset 7, bit D7), anybody
> experienced
> time outs?
Yes - both from failing CF cards and also other random events (bad
connections, people removing live cards etc)
> (4) Re Error register (offset 1) bit D7 (BBK), again, I was told that it
> cannot (???)
> happen since the CF performs read-after-write and it automatically switches
> good blocks
> for bad ones... Is this correct?
Depends on your hardware vendor. It certainly *can* occur with some CF
cards perhaps when they run out of spare blocks.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists