[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4820EA7B.4050406@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 16:32:11 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Kevin Winchester <kjwinchester@...il.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: linux-next: WARNING: at kernel/panic.c:375 __stack_chk_test+0x50/0x54()
Kevin Winchester wrote:
> David Miller wrote:
>> From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
>> Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 12:49:33 -0700
>>
>>> this is weird; something is adding ANOTHER -fstack-protector to the
>>> (effective) gcc
>>> flags.. which might be overriding the -fstack-protector-all setting.
>>>
>>> I wonder if this is a distro special ;(
>>
>> Ubuntu adds -fstack-protector to the GCC command line.
>>
>> But I've been able to override it trivially when, for example, doing
>> GCC builds, by simply adding -fno-stack-protector.
>
> I assume adding -fno-stack-protector would not really be an option in
> this case (since if I understand correctly it would be appended to the
> end of the flags which would turn the option off).
>
> I guess I'll be figuring out how to build my own gcc...
one question (since I don't have an ubuntu system on my desk right now)
if you do
make V=1 kernel/panic.o
(after deleting that file if needed), can you check that -fstack-protector-all is the last
stack protector option we explicitly give to gcc ?
(anything else is distro special which we unfortunately cannot fix.. but maybe we can detect)
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists