[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87zlr36l9x.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix>
Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 00:54:50 +0100
From: Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 11/19] UML - Track and make up lost ticks
On 6 May 2008, Andrew Morton uttered the following:
> On Tue, 6 May 2008 17:44:35 -0400
> Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 01:46:55PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> > This fix was already present in your "[PATCH 4/19] UML - Random driver fixes".
>>
>> Ah, so that's where it ended up.
>
> Strange that the bug has always been there. Some other change made it
> apparent?
Yeah, there was a re-prototyping of the broken prototype above the only
use outside the file where the function is defined, and this patch
removed that re-prottyping. :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists