linux-kernel - Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 6 May 2008 14:43:18 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, sfrench@...ibm.com,
	swhiteho@...hat.com, stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de, jeff@...zik.org,
	ralf@...ux-mips.org, drzeus-list@...eus.cx, jack@....cz,
	cbou@...l.ru, jens.axboe@...cle.com, ericvh@...il.com,
	wim@...ana.be, chris@...kel.net, nico@....org, clameter@....com,
	ezk@...sunysb.edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next

On Mon, 5 May 2008 11:31:28 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> So I'd suggest that you have a #for-next which contains material for 2.6.26
> and 2.6.27 and a #for-mm which contains material for 2.6.28+.
> 
> Only problem is, I'd need to generate the #for-next -> #for-mm diff, and
> that particular git operation has been troublesome in the past.

Yeah, it is fine if one is a subset of the other but otherwise fraught
with danger.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped