linux-kernel - Re: x86: Clean up computation of HPET .mult variables

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1210134094.17132.228.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Tue, 06 May 2008 21:21:34 -0700
From:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
To:	"Carlos R. Mafra" <crmafra2@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com
Subject: Re: x86: Clean up computation of HPET .mult variables


On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 00:39 -0300, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> So comparing with the numbers you quoted from your experiments
> you will realize that the value you got with my patch is actually
> 10 times better, so your assumption about clocksource_hz2mult
> being more correct is not good.

If that's the case then we really need to correct
clocksource_hz2mult() .. Since that function is what we use to calculate
the mult in most cases.

Daniel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/