[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18b669d80805062132m618e0e1fwf92bbb2ced393cb@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 13:32:01 +0900
From: "Shigeo N" <shigeonx@...il.com>
To: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
Cc: "Andi Kleen" <andi@...stfloor.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: XTP for 2.6.25
I tested again on Linux 2.6.25 with TCP reordering patch.
Of course, TCP performance was improved.
Here is the result.
case2-2) random delay (with TCP reordering patch)
In this case, add a fixed amount of delay + 10% random delay by command,
"tc change dev eth0 root netem delay 100ms 10ms 25%".
fixed delay UDP/TCP/XTP throghput
---------------------------------------
10ms 88/85/92 Mbps
30ms 88/67/91 Mbps
50ms 88/58/89 Mbps
70ms 88/43/80 Mbps
100ms 88/26/66 Mbps
case2) random delay (without TCP reordering patch)
In this case, add a fixed amount of delay + 10% random delay by command,
"tc change dev eth0 root netem delay 100ms 10ms 25%".
fixed delay UDP/TCP/XTP throghput
---------------------------------------
10ms 88/80/92 Mbps
30ms 88/51/91 Mbps
50ms 88/41/89 Mbps
70ms 88/28/80 Mbps
100ms 88/19/66 Mbps
case1) fixed delay
In this case, just adds a fixed amount of delay to all packets going out by
command, "tc qdisc add dev eth0 root netem delay 100ms".
fixed delay UDP/TCP/XTP throghput
---------------------------------------
10ms 88/85/92 Mbps
30ms 88/70/91 Mbps
50ms 88/63/89 Mbps
70ms 88/52/84 Mbps
100ms 88/36/70 Mbps
Thanks,
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Ilpo Järvinen
<ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi> wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Apr 2008, Shigeo N wrote:
>
>> case2) random delay
>>
>> In this case, add a fixed amount of delay + 10% random delay by
>> command, "tc change dev eth0 root netem delay 100ms 10ms 25%".
>>
>> Here is the result.
>>
>> fixed delay UDP/TCP/XTP throghput
>> ---------------------------------------
>> 10ms 88/80/92 Mbps
>> 30ms 88/51/91 Mbps
>> 50ms 88/41/89 Mbps
>> 70ms 88/28/80 Mbps
>> 100ms 88/19/66 Mbps
>>
>> TCP's perfomance looks very poor when delay is long and variable.
>
> Where these results with 2.6.25 as well? ...John Heffner just couple of
> days ago fixed reordering related problem in TCP (in case that netem
> parametrization causes reordering), the fix is not even in 2.6.24.y, I
> think...
>
> --
> i.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists