linux-kernel - Re: [resend] [PATCH v2] ibmaem: New driver for power/energy meters in IBM System X hardware

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080507080105.5484c58a@hyperion.delvare>
Date:	Wed, 7 May 2008 08:01:05 +0200
From:	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	djwong@...ibm.com, mhoffman@...htlink.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lm-sensors@...sensors.org
Subject: Re: [resend] [PATCH v2] ibmaem: New driver for  power/energy meters
 in IBM System X hardware

On Tue, 6 May 2008 17:36:07 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> A checkpatch version which you might not have says
> 
> WARNING: consider using strict_strtol in preference to simple_strtol
> #1015: FILE: drivers/hwmon/ibmaem.c:918:
> +       int temp = simple_strtol(buf, NULL, 10); \
> 
> total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 1221 lines checked
> 
> because the code as you have it will accept input of the form "12foo". 
> strict_strtol() will error on that.

As a side note, I really wonder why this new function wasn't named just
strtol(), especially if the general idea is to get rid of the "simple"
variant after some time.

-- 
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/