linux-kernel - Re: Reverting per-cpuset "system" (IRQ affinity) patch (was: Fix cpuset sched_relax_domain

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1210142681.13978.166.camel@twins>
Date:	Wed, 07 May 2008 08:44:41 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, menage@...gle.com,
	seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com, mingo@...e.hu,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, maxk@...lcomm.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, oleg@...sign.ru, rostedt@...dmis.org,
	rientjes@...gle.com
Subject: Re: Reverting per-cpuset "system" (IRQ affinity) patch (was: Fix
	cpuset sched_relax_domain_level control file)

On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 22:52 -0500, Paul Jackson wrote:
> Andrew wrote:
> > Don't worry about it.  I sorted out things locally and I expect that
> > Stephen will be able to as well.
> 
> Ok ...
> 
> I hesitate more than I should some times to NAQ patches,
> but the more I think about this one, the less willing I
> am to have a per-cpuset file called "system".
> 
> I'm not sure what "sorted out" means ... I'll wait and see.
> 
> Thanks, Andrew.
> 
> Sorry, Max, Peter and Ingo ... we really had not arrived at
> agreement on this one.

No problem, I've been meaning to redo this whole series but somehow
stuff got in the way and I never got around to it :-/


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/