[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080507163643.d4da0ed0.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 16:36:43 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"nickpiggin@...oo.com.au" <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
tonyb@...ernetics.com, mika.penttila@...umbus.fi
Subject: [PATCH] more ZERO_PAGE handling in follow_page()
Rewrote the description of patch. (no changes in the logic.)
Thank you for all help.
-Kame
==
follow_page() is called from get_user_pages(), which returns specified user page.
follow_page() can return 1) a page or 2) NULL or 3)ZERO_PAGE.
If NULL, handle_mm_fault() is called.
Now, follow_page() to unused pte returns NULL if page table exists. As a result
get_user_pages() calls handle_mm_fault() and allocate new memory.
This behavior increases memory consumption at coredump, which does
read-once-but-never-written page fault.
By returning ZERO_PAGE() against READ/ANON request, we can avoid it.
(Because exec's arguments copy needs to call handle_mm_fault at WRITE/ANON
request, we just handle READ/ANON case here.)
Change log:
- Rewrote patch description and Added comments.
- fixed to check pte_present()/pte_none() in proper way.
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Tony Battersby <tonyb@...ernetics.com>
Acked-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
---
mm/memory.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.25/mm/memory.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.25.orig/mm/memory.c
+++ linux-2.6.25/mm/memory.c
@@ -926,15 +926,15 @@ struct page *follow_page(struct vm_area_
page = NULL;
pgd = pgd_offset(mm, address);
if (pgd_none(*pgd) || unlikely(pgd_bad(*pgd)))
- goto no_page_table;
+ goto null_or_zeropage;
pud = pud_offset(pgd, address);
if (pud_none(*pud) || unlikely(pud_bad(*pud)))
- goto no_page_table;
+ goto null_or_zeropage;
pmd = pmd_offset(pud, address);
if (pmd_none(*pmd) || unlikely(pmd_bad(*pmd)))
- goto no_page_table;
+ goto null_or_zeropage;
if (pmd_huge(*pmd)) {
BUG_ON(flags & FOLL_GET);
@@ -947,8 +947,14 @@ struct page *follow_page(struct vm_area_
goto out;
pte = *ptep;
- if (!pte_present(pte))
+ if (!pte_present(pte)) {
+ /* Read fault to empty pte can return ZERO_PAGE */
+ if (!(flags & FOLL_WRITE) && pte_none(pte)) {
+ pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptl);
+ goto null_or_zeropage;
+ }
goto unlock;
+ }
if ((flags & FOLL_WRITE) && !pte_write(pte))
goto unlock;
page = vm_normal_page(vma, address, pte);
@@ -968,7 +974,7 @@ unlock:
out:
return page;
-no_page_table:
+null_or_zeropage:
/*
* When core dumping an enormous anonymous area that nobody
* has touched so far, we don't want to allocate page tables.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists