linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fix UML on x86-64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805061712380.32269@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 6 May 2008 17:15:15 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>
cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, tglx@...utronix.de,
	Jeff Dike <jdike@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix UML on x86-64



On Tue, 6 May 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> Yes, I'll revert that commit

And btw, a revert is what I'm going to do, not just bump the gcc version 
up as in Uli's patch. As mentioned, if it was about gcc versions, matching 
the x86 choice should have been the much better tested one than picking 
another version at random.

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/