[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <adahcdaw2oc.fsf@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 08:32:03 -0700
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
To: Stefan Roscher <ossrosch@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"LinuxPPC-Dev" <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
"OF-EWG" <ewg@...ts.openfabrics.org>, fenkes@...ibm.com,
raisch@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [ewg] [PATCH] IB/ehca: Protect QP against destroying until all async events for it are handled.
> We are not sure if this should be fixed in the driver or in uverbs itself.
> Roland, what's your opinion about this?
Would be nice to be able to fix it in uverbs but I don't see how. In
particular a kernel consumer has to have the same guarantee that no
async events will come in after destroy QP returns. And I don't see any
way generic code can provide a guarantee about what low-level driver
code may do internally.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists