linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Fix cpuset sched_relax_domain

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080506183138.546f42d9.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 6 May 2008 18:31:38 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
Cc:	Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>,
	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix cpuset sched_relax_domain_level control file

On Tue, 06 May 2008 18:08:17 -0700 Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com> wrote:

> Fix cpuset sched_relax_domain_level control file
> 
> Due to a merge conflict, the sched_relax_domain_level control file was
> marked as being handled by cpuset_read/write_u64, but the code to handle it
> was actually in cpuset_common_file_read/write.
> 
> Since the value being written/read is in fact a signed integer, it
> should be treated as such; this patch adds cpuset_read/write_s64
> functions, and uses them to handle the sched_relax_domain_level file.
> 
> With this patch, the sched_relax_domain_level can be read and written,
> and the correct contents seen/updated.
> 

OK, here we go again.

There is a patch in linux-next called "cpuset: system sets" which will
conflict with your change.

A bit of archeology indicates that this patch was sent out on Feb 27 and
received a bit of review feedback, including some serious-looking qualms
from Paul.  There was no response to that reviewer feedback and volia, the
damn code goes into linux-next without, afaict, any alteration.

Ingo, for the entyenth time: kernel/cpuset.c is not part of the CPU
scheduler.

argh.  Now what to do?  If I merge this patch then I need to drop
linux-next and if I drop linux-next I drop half my tree.

So I guess I need to merge this patch and then somehow smash linux-next on
top of it.  Thanks a lot.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/