[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080507175705.GE18260@duo.random>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 19:57:05 +0200
From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@...ranet.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>, Robin Holt <holt@....com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Kanoj Sarcar <kanojsarcar@...oo.com>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, general@...ts.openfabrics.org,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...ibm.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@...ck.org>,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03 of 11] invalidate_page outside PT lock
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 01:39:43PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Would it be an idea to merge them into one, so the first patch
> introduces the right conventions directly?
The only reason this isn't merged into one, is that this requires
non obvious (not difficult though) to the core VM code. I wanted to
keep an obviously safe approach for 2.6.26. The other conventions are
only needed by XPMEM and XPMEM can't work without all other patches anyway.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists