lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 20:40:54 -0500 From: Paul Jackson <pj@....com> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: menage@...gle.com, seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com, mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix cpuset sched_relax_domain_level control file Andrew wrote: > There is a patch in linux-next called "cpuset: system sets" which will > conflict with your change. Yeah - I was looking at that patch earlier today, when I was scratching my head, trying to figure out what I broke with mmotm. I still don't like it. The conversation evolved into a couple of positions, mine and someone elses, I forget whom. From what I can recall now, neither of those positions endorsed the original patch, as you have it. Then the conversation died out, as all parties involved other than perhaps myself prefer to work on stuff that can result in successful patches, rather than ongoing debates. What's the easiest way to get from where we are now, to a world without that patch? -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.940.382.4214 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists