lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 21:08:40 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> To: Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ued.net> cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> Subject: Re: [git pull] x86 fixes On Wed, 7 May 2008, Andres Salomon wrote: > > Sorry, this should not have gone mainline. We had your patch queued > > (via Andrew) and it had testing failures, which we sent to you. One > > workaround was that build patch. When we dropped your patch we forgot > > to remove the workaround as well. > > > > Will it be removed, then? I haven't seen any explanation of its > benefits, and Adrian's point about not catching build failures in > olpc_battery is valid. Yes, it's scheduled for the next pull request. What's the state of the build failures of your original patch ? Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists