[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080507130528.adfd154c.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 13:05:28 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@...ranet.com>
Cc: clameter@....com, steiner@....com, holt@....com, npiggin@...e.de,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
kanojsarcar@...oo.com, rdreier@...co.com,
swise@...ngridcomputing.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
avi@...ranet.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
general@...ts.openfabrics.org, hugh@...itas.com,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, aliguori@...ibm.com, chrisw@...hat.com,
marcelo@...ck.org, dada1@...mosbay.com, paulmck@...ibm.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01 of 11] mmu-notifier-core
On Wed, 07 May 2008 16:35:51 +0200
Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@...ranet.com> wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@...ranet.com>
> # Date 1210096013 -7200
> # Node ID e20917dcc8284b6a07cfcced13dda4cbca850a9c
> # Parent 5026689a3bc323a26d33ad882c34c4c9c9a3ecd8
> mmu-notifier-core
The patch looks OK to me.
The proposal is that we sneak this into 2.6.26. Are there any
sufficiently-serious objections to this?
The patch will be a no-op for 2.6.26.
This is all rather unusual. For the record, could we please review the
reasons for wanting to do this?
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists