| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4822110E.6090403@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 22:29:02 +0200 From: Jacek Luczak <difrost.kernel@...il.com> To: Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca> CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@...il.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, ide <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Suspend to memory is freezing my machine Robert Hancock pisze: >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> With recent 2.6.25 & 2.6.26-rc1 git (around 1 week) I get >>>>>>>>> occasionally >>>>>>>>> complete freeze of my T61 during suspend. (dual core, 2GB). >>>>>>>> How reproducible is this? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'm running kernel with no_console_suspend - but all I can see is >>>>>>>>> blinking cursor on an empty screen - thus even when I run >>>>>>>>> kernel with >>>>>>>>> most debug options turned on, I can't pass more details so far. I >>>>>>>>> run >>>>>>>>> suspend with with SD card in - so maybe some update in the MMC >>>>>>>>> driver >>>>>>>>> might be responsible for this ? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Also - I think that option no_console_suspend doens't work >>>>>>>>> correctly - >>>>>>>>> as many times with suspend I do not see any log message on my >>>>>>>>> console >>>>>>>>> screen. However sometimes the log is shown. >>>>>>>> It would be helpful if you could verify if: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> (1) The problem occurs without no_console_suspend. >>>>>>>> (2) The problem occurs without the SD card. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Rafael, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> same problem here, although I was able to resume system (it's >>>>>>> basically Intel >>>>>>> machine) , but it was unusable - I was able to switch between >>>>>>> terminals and see >>>>>>> output from kernel. So there was: >>>>>>> - Disabling irq #19; >>>>>>> - some kind of lock spinning on disk: >>>>>>> IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801GBM/GHM (ICH7 Family) >>>>>>> Serial ATA >>>>>>> Storage >>>>>>> Controller IDE (rev 02) >>>>>>> but I can't provide more output of that lock now - no sign in >>>>>>> logs. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've made some successful suspend/resume all without sound card >>>>>>> active >>>>>>> without >>>>>>> problem. Those appear with sound card active, but I must take closer >>>>>>> look - will >>>>>>> send info later. >>>>>> Can you post your dmesg and /proc/interrupts output from normal >>>>>> bootup ? >>>>> Sure I can ;) >>>>> >>>>> 1) /proc/interrupts >>>>> >>>>> CPU0 CPU1 >>>>> 0: 11846981 0 IO-APIC-edge timer >>>>> 1: 30098 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042 >>>>> 8: 3 0 IO-APIC-edge rtc >>>>> 9: 13 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi acpi >>>>> 12: 1776540 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042 >>>>> 14: 39 0 IO-APIC-edge ata_piix >>>>> 15: 0 0 IO-APIC-edge ata_piix >>>>> 16: 54570 44642 IO-APIC-fasteoi i915@pci:0000:00:02.0 >>>>> 17: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb3 >>>>> 18: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb4 >>>>> 19: 98243 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi ata_piix, uhci_hcd:usb5 >>>>> 21: 1650574 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi HDA Intel >>>>> 23: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi ehci_hcd:usb1, >>>>> uhci_hcd:usb2 >>>>> 220: 14263 0 PCI-MSI-edge iwl3945 >>>>> 221: 1166041 1333296 PCI-MSI-edge eth0 >>>>> NMI: 0 0 Non-maskable interrupts >>>>> LOC: 1104887 7534969 Local timer interrupts >>>>> RES: 633378 701351 Rescheduling interrupts >>>>> CAL: 16 28315 function call interrupts >>>>> TLB: 1721 2620 TLB shootdowns >>>>> TRM: 0 0 Thermal event interrupts >>>>> SPU: 0 0 Spurious interrupts >>>>> ERR: 0 >>>>> MIS: 0 >>>>> >>>>> 2) dmesg can here -> >>>>> http://212.109.128.251/~difrost/linux-next/dmesg.log >>>>> 3) Kernel: >>>>> Linux difrost 2.6.25-07422-gb66e1f1-dirty #14 SMP Fri May 2 22:04:17 >>>>> CEST 2008 >>>>> i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux >>>>> It's marked dirty because due to http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/2/405 >>>>> patch applied. >>>>> >>>>> -Jacek >>>>> >>>> Well, if IRQ 19 got disabled, that's your SATA controller, so resume >>>> likely isn't going to work. Could be a libata problem? CCing linux-ide. >>> Yep, I know, that's why I pointed that out. Irq was disabled somehow >>> in suspend >>> or resume process. >>> >>>> BTW, if your BIOS offers an option to enable AHCI on your SATA >>>> controller then that would be a more optimal configuration (could get >>>> NCQ support), but that is an aside. >>> With AHCI I've got pretty bad timings (and I don't really know why!): >>> >>> [root|20:49|~]$ cat sda_ahci_t >>> >>> /dev/sda: >>> Timing cached reads: 1560 MB in 2.00 seconds = 780.51 MB/sec >>> Timing buffered disk reads: 102 MB in 3.02 seconds = 33.74 MB/sec >>> [root|20:49|~]$ cat sda_piix_t >>> >>> /dev/sda: >>> Timing cached reads: 1544 MB in 2.00 seconds = 772.35 MB/sec >>> Timing buffered disk reads: 134 MB in 3.04 seconds = 44.05 MB/sec >> >> Here's the latest report (all on latest git): >> 1) I've switched to AHCI mode and suspend/resume works OK (because >> SATA >> controller irq is not disabled). >> >> 2) now /proc/interrupts look like that: >> CPU0 CPU1 >> 0: 110708 0 IO-APIC-edge timer >> 1: 4008 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042 >> 8: 3 0 IO-APIC-edge rtc >> 9: 15091 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi acpi >> 12: 77467 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042 >> 14: 44 0 IO-APIC-edge ata_piix >> 15: 0 0 IO-APIC-edge ata_piix >> 16: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi i915@pci:0000:00:02.0 >> 17: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb3 >> 18: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb4 >> 19: 100001 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb5 >> 21: 282 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi HDA Intel >> 23: 1 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi ehci_hcd:usb1, >> uhci_hcd:usb2 >> 219: 858 0 PCI-MSI-edge iwl3945 >> 220: 8616 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth0 >> 221: 6423 0 PCI-MSI-edge ahci >> NMI: 0 0 Non-maskable interrupts >> LOC: 15777 64510 Local timer interrupts >> RES: 9045 24560 Rescheduling interrupts >> CAL: 30 28255 function call interrupts >> TLB: 341 145 TLB shootdowns >> TRM: 0 0 Thermal event interrupts >> SPU: 0 0 Spurious interrupts >> ERR: 0 >> MIS: 0 >> >> 3) The IRQ #19 remains disabled after resume and produce: >> irq 19: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option) >> Pid: 13, comm: kacpi_notify Not tainted >> 2.6.26-rc1-07561-gafa26be-dirty #16 >> [<c013ea27>] __report_bad_irq+0x24/0x69 >> [<c013ea2e>] __report_bad_irq+0x2b/0x69 >> [<c013ec25>] note_interrupt+0x1b9/0x210 >> [<c013e36c>] handle_IRQ_event+0x1a/0x3f >> [<c013f195>] handle_fasteoi_irq+0x84/0xa2 >> [<c0104fde>] do_IRQ+0x4f/0x65 >> [<c01034ff>] common_interrupt+0x23/0x28 >> [<c013007b>] timekeeping_resume+0x9b/0x127 >> [<c020b090>] acpi_os_read_port+0x29/0x44 >> [<c02177c9>] acpi_hw_register_read+0x61/0x119 >> [<c020f76e>] acpi_ev_fixed_event_detect+0x2a/0xa0 >> [<c021001a>] acpi_ev_sci_xrupt_handler+0x9/0x17 >> [<c020b053>] acpi_irq+0xb/0x1f >> [<c013e36c>] handle_IRQ_event+0x1a/0x3f >> [<c013f181>] handle_fasteoi_irq+0x70/0xa2 >> [<c0104fde>] do_IRQ+0x4f/0x65 >> [<c020b623>] acpi_os_execute_deferred+0x0/0x25 >> [<c01034ff>] common_interrupt+0x23/0x28 >> [<c020b623>] acpi_os_execute_deferred+0x0/0x25 >> [<c020b0b8>] acpi_os_write_port+0xd/0x2c >> [<c020b640>] acpi_os_execute_deferred+0x1d/0x25 >> [<c01290fa>] run_workqueue+0x69/0xda >> [<c0129221>] worker_thread+0xb6/0xc2 >> [<c012bca6>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2d >> [<c012916b>] worker_thread+0x0/0xc2 >> [<c012ba42>] kthread+0x38/0x5d >> [<c012ba0a>] kthread+0x0/0x5d >> [<c010370f>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10 >> ======================= >> handlers: >> [<c027d100>] (usb_hcd_irq+0x0/0x53) >> Disabling IRQ #19 > > Hmm, so either it's the SATA controller still generating that IRQ even > when it's in AHCI mode, or else it's USB that's the real problem.. I thing your are right here. I've made some basic tests. Removed USB support form kernel and then suspend/resume with new one. There were no disabled irq printouts as the one above. But then I've started new kernel compilation (back with USB support and CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND=y) and suddenly Irq 221 was disabled - the ,,nobody cared'' error was printed out. Kernel was trying to reset it but it stacked (I will try to catch those messages). I will make some tests on second system (I wouldn't like to break primary, as while kernel is trying to bring back disk to live, the xfs errors are printed - mainly failed writes). -Jacek -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists