[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080507140357.9320dfcd.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 14:03:57 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Krzysztof Helt <krzysztof.h1@...zta.fm>
Cc: JosephChan@....com.tw, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
linux-fbdev-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] [PATCH 1/9] viafb: VIA Frame Buffer Device
Driver - Resend
On Wed, 7 May 2008 18:43:33 +0200
Krzysztof Helt <krzysztof.h1@...zta.fm> wrote:
> A general comment is that you use to many global variables.
yes, that was my first impression. The _names_ of those variables is a
real problem. lcd_mode, DeviceStatus, second_size, primary_dev, etc. The
driver is attempting to reserve all those names for itself, kernel-wide.
So at a minimum, going through and prepending viafb_ onto all those would
be needed.
There are a number of layout glitches in there. Such as a strange combination of
two styles:
void foo(void)
{
versus
void foo(void ) {
Many of these things can be pinpointed by processing the diff with
scripts/checkpatch.pl.
Administrative note: all nine patches had the same title "viafb: VIA Frame
Buffer Device Driver". Please choose unique and meaningful names for each
patch, such as "viafb: add utility header file".
Apart from those fairly easily-fixed things, the driver looks pretty good
from a quick scan, given how large it is, and given that it probably has
been around for quite a long time..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists