[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080507143537.94d744c5.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 14:35:37 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Fix cpumask_scnprintf_len() misdesign
On Thu, 8 May 2008 02:14:50 +0400
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> wrote:
> cpumask_scnprintf_len() takes "len" as an argument which is surprising,
> If one follows call chain down it isn't length but number of bits. But
> there is natural number of bits when talking about CPU masks -- NR_CPUS.
> So use that.
hm, maybe we should delete this function after all ;)
> Remove 1:1 wrapper macro while I'm at it.
There was a reason most of those 1:1 wrappers but yes, this one seems to be
rather cargo-cultish.
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
> ---
>
> include/linux/cpumask.h | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
> @@ -289,11 +289,9 @@ static inline int __cpumask_scnprintf(char *buf, int len,
> return bitmap_scnprintf(buf, len, srcp->bits, nbits);
> }
>
> -#define cpumask_scnprintf_len(len) \
> - __cpumask_scnprintf_len((len))
> -static inline int __cpumask_scnprintf_len(int len)
> +static inline int cpumask_scnprintf_len(void)
> {
> - return bitmap_scnprintf_len(len);
> + return bitmap_scnprintf_len(NR_CPUS);
> }
>
> #define cpumask_parse_user(ubuf, ulen, dst) \
Does Paul have an opinion?
(Well, Paul always has an opinion. But what is it?)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists