[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1210196777.26103.8.camel@mtlp.tischlernetz>
Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 23:46:17 +0200
From: Mirco Tischler <mt-ml@....de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG]:WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c:122 in 2.6.26-rc1
On Mi, 2008-05-07 at 22:58 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 7 May 2008, Mirco Tischler wrote:
>
> > On Mi, 2008-05-07 at 21:06 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > [11677.490019] CPU1 is down
> > > > [11677.490149] Extended CMOS year: 2000
> > > > [11677.490149] x86 PAT enabled: cpu 0, old 0x7040600070406, new
> > > > 0x7010600070106
> > > > [11677.490747] Back to C!
> > > > [11677.490952] microcode: CPU0 updated from revision 0x92 to 0x92, date
> > > > = 03132007
>
> That's an odd one: updated from revision 0x92 to 0x92
>
> It's right before the warning triggers. Is this microcode message in
> all your boot/resume logs ?
Yes, wondered about that too. It's defintely not on all resumes. But it
is on more than that single one triggering the warning:
May 7 19:53:21 kernel: [4307505.090195] Extended CMOS year: 2000
May 7 19:53:21 kernel: [4307505.090195] x86 PAT enabled: cpu 0, old 0x7040600070406, new 0x7010600070106
May 7 19:53:21 kernel: [4307505.090195] Back to C!
May 7 19:53:21 kernel: [4307505.090195] microcode: CPU0 updated from revision 0x92 to 0x92, date = 03132007
May 7 19:53:21 kernel: [4307505.090195] Extended CMOS year: 2000
May 7 21:52:04 kernel: [4294896.091827] Extended CMOS year: 2000
May 7 21:52:04 kernel: [4294896.091827] x86 PAT enabled: cpu 0, old 0x7040600070406, new 0x7010600070106
May 7 21:52:04 kernel: [4294896.091827] Back to C!
May 7 21:52:04 kernel: [4294896.091827] Extended CMOS year: 2000
Thanks
Mirco
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists