linux-kernel - Re: sparc64 bootup regression...

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 8 May 2008 00:09:45 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	y-goto@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: sparc64 bootup regression...

On Wednesday, 30 of April 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 23:12:41 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > This commit causes bootup failures on sparc64:
> > 
> > commit 86f6dae1377523689bd8468fed2f2dd180fc0560
> > Author: Yasunori Goto <y-goto@...fujitsu.com>
> > Date:   Mon Apr 28 02:13:33 2008 -0700
> > 
> >     memory hotplug: allocate usemap on the section with pgdat
> >     
> >     Usemaps are allocated on the section which has pgdat by this.
> >     
> >     Because usemap size is very small, many other sections usemaps are allocated
> >     on only one page.  If a section has usemap, it can't be removed until removing
> >     other sections.  This dependency is not desirable for memory removing.
> >     
> >     Pgdat has similar feature.  When a section has pgdat area, it must be the last
> >     section for removing on the node.  So, if section A has pgdat and section B
> >     has usemap for section A, Both sections can't be removed due to dependency
> >     each other.
> >     
> >     To solve this issue, this patch collects usemap on same section with pgdat.
> >     If other sections doesn't have any dependency, this section will be able to be
> >     removed finally.
> 
> Thanks.  Does a straightforward revert fix it?  If so, we could do that while heads
> are being scratched.

Has that been reverted already?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/