[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080506190809.df1b9398.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 19:08:09 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
Cc: "Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com>, lizf@...fujitsu.com,
seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix cpuset sched_relax_domain_level control file
On Tue, 6 May 2008 20:58:52 -0500 Paul Jackson <pj@....com> wrote:
> Paul M wrote:
> > I was just trying to get close to the original behaviour.
>
> An honorable goal.
>
> Li Zefan - would you be interested in generating a patch
> that fails -EINVAL for inputs outside the range of [-1 ... N]
> for whatever small positive N the kernel recognizes?
I'd like to get Paul's patch into mainline this evening, to give us a
chance to get the subsequent mess sorted out in time for next
linux-next[*]. So there's no rush on this update.
[*] Judging by this:
kernel/cpuset.c: In function 'cpuset_common_file_write':
kernel/cpuset.c:1374: warning: passing argument 3 of 'update_flag' makes integer from pointer without a cast
kernel/cpuset.c: In function 'cpuset_destroy':
kernel/cpuset.c:1793: warning: passing argument 3 of 'update_flag' makes integer from pointer without a cast
Paul should drop sched-devel. I'm suspecting it contains stale old stuff
which wasn't supposed to be there.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists