[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805071601090.3024@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 16:03:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@...ranet.com>
cc: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>, npiggin@...e.de,
chrisw@...hat.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
marcelo@...ck.org, kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
kanojsarcar@...oo.com, steiner@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, avi@...ranet.com,
aliguori@...ibm.com, paulmck@...ibm.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
holt@....com, general@...ts.openfabrics.org, hugh@...itas.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, dada1@...mosbay.com,
clameter@....com
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: [PATCH 01 of 11] mmu-notifier-core
On Thu, 8 May 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> Ok so I see the problem Linus is referring to now (I received the hint
> by PM too), I thought the order of the signed-off-by was relevant, it
> clearly isn't or we're wasting space ;)
The order of the signed-offs are somewhat relevant, but no, sign-offs
don't mean authorship.
See the rules for sign-off: you can sign off on another persons patches,
even if they didn't sign off on them themselves. That's clause (b) in
particular.
So yes, quite often you'd _expect_ the first sign-off to match the author,
but that's a correlation, not a causal relationship.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists