[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080507230628.GM18516@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 01:06:28 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.26, PAT and AMD family 6
On Wed 2008-05-07 15:45:18, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz> wrote:
> > On Wed 2008-05-07 15:23:46, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > > > 2) HPA said it was bad idea
> > >
> > > hpa said white list is not a good idea.
> >
> > And guess what your patch is doing?
> >
> >
> > + switch (c->x86_vendor) {
> > + case X86_VENDOR_AMD:
> > + if (c->x86 >= 0xf && c->x86 <= 0x11)
> > + set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_PAT);
> > + break;
> > + case X86_VENDOR_INTEL:
> > + if (c->x86 == 0xF || (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model >=
> > 15))
> > + set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_PAT);
> > + break;
> > + }
> >
> > Seems like a whitelist to me. Will break with future CPUs.
>
> again, i only increased the whitelist a little bit to support AMD
> opteron Rev E, Rev F and Fam10h that I could access.
(Which is what your commit log should have said, btw).
> the code handle future cpus should reach the kernel list before SW
> developer could get system....
There's no reason why 2.6.26 should not work reasonably on cpus
released in 2015.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists