linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Fix cpuset sched_relax_domain

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080506192825.53272f35.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 6 May 2008 19:28:25 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com>
Cc:	"Paul Jackson" <pj@....com>, lizf@...fujitsu.com,
	seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com, mingo@...e.hu,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix cpuset sched_relax_domain_level control file

On Tue, 6 May 2008 19:15:27 -0700 "Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com> wrote:

> On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 7:11 PM, Paul Jackson <pj@....com> wrote:
> > Andrew wrote:
> >  > Paul should drop sched-devel.
> >
> >  I hope that refers to Paul M.
> 
> I'm building against 2.6.26-rc1, and don't see those warnings (or any
> useful code at those lines). It's probably more fallout from the
> cpuset files changes?

It's the git-sched-devel changes in linux-next.  Seems they are unaware of
the update_flag() changes we made in mainline last week.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/