[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080507234824.f097f96d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 23:48:24 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1
On Thu, 8 May 2008 08:43:40 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> great! Yanmin, could you please also check the other patch i sent (also
> attached below), does it solve the regression similarly?
>
> Ingo
>
> ---
> lib/kernel_lock.c | 9 ++++++---
but but but. Some other users of down() have presumably also regressed. We just
have't found the workload to demonstrate that yet.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists