[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080508184038.f3f2af47.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 18:40:38 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Mark res_counter_charge(_locked) with __must_check
On Thu, 08 May 2008 13:05:44 +0400
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org> wrote:
> Ignoring theirs return value may result in counter underflow
> in the future - when the value charged will be uncharged (or in
> "leaks" - when the value is not uncharged).
>
> This also prevents from using charging routines to decrement the
> counter value (i.e. uncharge it) ;)
>
> (Current code works OK with res_counter, however :) )
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
>
nice check :)
BTW, res_counter_charge_locked() should be extern function ?
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists