[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805081152310.3318@apollo.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 11:55:14 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: the purge :-)
On Thu, 8 May 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Having published my expectations of what should be in linux-next, I am
> no implementing what I think is what I said. :-)
>
> This is open to discussion (including suggestions about other trees).
>
> The following trees are being excluded from today because I think that
> they contain changes that:
> - have not been published/reviewed/tested sufficiently
> - are not currently intended for 2.6.26 or 2.6.27.
> (not all reasons apply to all trees). Please don't take offense, I am
> just trying to obey my own guidelines.
>
> ldp
> x86_latest
> sched_latest
>
> Ingo, I assume that things will migrate from {x86,sched} latest to
> for-akpm (for-next?) over time.
We are working on refactoring our x86 work flow. We'll give you
notice, when the dust of the demolition has settled.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists