[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080508193224.0EFF.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 19:38:17 +0900
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...source.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] call_usermodehelper_setup() should use GFP_KERNEL
Hi
Thanks good comment!
> > How many times do we have to make this mistake :(
> >
> > Only the caller knows what allocation mode the callee can use.
> > call_usermodehelper_setup() should be extended to take a gfp_t argument.
>
> Yeah, but making the caller need to know about the internal
> implementation details of the callee (ie, whether it needs to allocate
> memory or not) leads to pretty warty interfaces. In this case, you
> could push the gfp_t up to the call_usermodehelper_setup() level, but
> pushing it any higher wouldn't make much sense.
No problem :)
almost caller doesn't call call_usermodehelper_setup() directly.
thus, call_usermodehelper_setup() chage is hided in call_usermodehelper().
----------------chunk of my current testing patch-----------------------------
@@ -68,8 +69,9 @@ static inline int
call_usermodehelper(char *path, char **argv, char **envp, enum umh_wait wait)
{
struct subprocess_info *info;
+ gfp_t gfp_mask = (wait == UMH_NO_WAIT) ? GFP_ATOMIC : GFP_KERNEL;
- info = call_usermodehelper_setup(path, argv, envp);
+ info = call_usermodehelper_setup(path, argv, envp, gfp_mask);
if (info == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
return call_usermodehelper_exec(info, wait);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists