linux-kernel - Re: clocksources: order of preference

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4822DF0B.8080109@gmx.de>
Date:	Thu, 08 May 2008 13:07:55 +0200
From:	Philipp Kohlbecher <xt28@....de>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: clocksources: order of preference

Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> We also check the TSC with a watchdog mechanism, which verifies that
> is is keeping accurate time. When we detect that TSC does not, we
> replace it by the next available clock source.
>   
True. In all the cases I know, the watchdog mechanism worked and marked 
the TSC as unstable. The soft lockup only led to a (sometimes 
considerable) delay at boot time.
> You may submit one, but it's very unlikely that is gets applied. :)
>   
Makes sense. :)

Thank you for your extremely quick reply!
- Philipp Kohlbecher
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/