[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0805071809170.14935@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 18:12:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@...ranet.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, steiner@....com,
holt@....com, npiggin@...e.de, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, kanojsarcar@...oo.com,
rdreier@...co.com, swise@...ngridcomputing.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, avi@...ranet.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
general@...ts.openfabrics.org, hugh@...itas.com,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, aliguori@...ibm.com, chrisw@...hat.com,
marcelo@...ck.org, dada1@...mosbay.com, paulmck@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08 of 11] anon-vma-rwsem
On Wed, 7 May 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> and you're now done. You have your "mm_lock()" (which still needs to be
> renamed - it should be a "mmu_notifier_lock()" or something like that),
> but you don't need the insane sorting. At most you apparently need a way
> to recognize duplicates (so that you don't deadlock on yourself), which
> looks like a simple bit-per-vma.
Andrea's mm_lock could have wider impact. It is the first effective
way that I have seen of temporarily holding off reclaim from an address
space. It sure is a brute force approach.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists