[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48232DFB.1030703@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 09:44:43 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: introduce a new Linux defined feature flag for PAT
support
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
>> Subject: x86: cleanup PAT cpu validation
>> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>> Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 09:18:43 +0200
>>
>> Move the scattered checks for PAT support to a single function. Its
>> moved to addon_cpuid_features.c as this file is shared between 32 and
>> 64 bit.
>
> thanks Thomas, i have applied your cleanup patch - looks good here too
> and it booted fine on a few boxes.
>
> (i did a small cleanup: changed the define to static const int)
>
> Peter, what are your plans for a more general cleanup and 32-bit/64-bit
> unification for the x86 CPU detection code - do you have any specific
> ideas already? I suspect we want it all to end up unified under
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/, by moving the relevant bits of
> arch/x86/kernel/setup_64.c there, right? It is no small task for sure.
>
Yes, that's the plan, and no, it's not a small task.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists