linux-kernel - Re: [patch 00/16] Linux 2.6.25 -stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080508183324.GA1874@1wt.eu>
Date:	Thu, 8 May 2008 20:33:24 +0200
From:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
	Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
	Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Chuck Wolber <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>,
	Chris Wedgwood <reviews@...cw.f00f.org>,
	Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>,
	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
	Domenico Andreoli <cavokz@...il.com>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/16] Linux 2.6.25 -stable review

On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 11:22:33AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 08:13:42PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 10:41:22AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.25.2 release.
> > > There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to
> > > this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let
> > > us know.  If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and wants
> > > to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it.
> > 
> > Greg, shouldn't we also queue this one (may be in a later version) ? It's
> > in mainline.
> 
> What problem does it solve?

from what I see in the code, currently acpi_power_get_state() will return
0 when setting resource to NULL, and some callers (eg: acpi_power_on())
will happily dereference resource if acpi_power_get_state() returns 0. So
I guess there are circumstances where we can oops.

> Does Len want it in -stable?

I simply forgot to ask. I'm CCing him.

Willy

> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 
> > >From a815ab8b5891f3d2515316655729272f68269e3b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
> > Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:27:29 -0700
> > Subject: ACPI: check a return value correctly in acpi_power_get_context()
> > 
> > We should check *resource != NULL rather than resource != NULL, which will be
> > always true.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
> > Acked-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/acpi/power.c |    2 +-
> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/power.c b/drivers/acpi/power.c
> > index 76bf6d9..f2a76ac 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/power.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/power.c
> > @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ acpi_power_get_context(acpi_handle handle,
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	*resource = acpi_driver_data(device);
> > -	if (!resource)
> > +	if (!*resource)
> >  		return -ENODEV;
> >  
> >  	return 0;
> > -- 
> > 1.5.3.8
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/