[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1JuBCt-0008E1-4E@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 20:51:07 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: hch@...radead.org
CC: miklos@...redi.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hch@...radead.org,
viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp,
sds@...ho.nsa.gov, jmorris@...ei.org, casey@...aufler-ca.com
Subject: Re: [patch 07/24] fat: dont call notify_change
> > From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
> >
> > The FAT_IOCTL_SET_ATTRIBUTES ioctl() calls notify_change() to change
> > the file mode before changing the inode attributes. Replace with
> > explicit call to fat_setattr().
> >
> > This is equivalent, except that security_inode_setattr() is not called
> > before fat_setattr(). I think this is not needed, since the mode
> > change is just a side effect of the attribute change.
>
> Actually I think we want the security_inode_setattr. This is an
> implicit chmode when switching the ATTR_RO flag on and off and we should
> have the full security check for it.
Yes, I'm a bit uncertain about this. It's a user action that triggers
the mode change. On the other hand it's just a side effect of the
ioctl. I can re-add the security check just to be on the safe side,
but probably nobody cares.
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists