[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <170fa0d20805081311r6b726762ndc83c5f626f0956c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 16:11:53 -0400
From: "Mike Snitzer" <snitzer@...il.com>
To: "Neil Brown" <neilb@...e.de>
Cc: linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
paul.clements@...eleye.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] md: avoid fullsync if a faulty member missed a dirty transition
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 2:13 AM, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de> wrote:
> On Tuesday May 6, snitzer@...il.com wrote:
> >
> > It looks like bitmap_update_sb()'s incrementing of events_cleared (on
> > behalf of the local member) could be racing with the fact that the NBD
> > member becomes faulty (whereby making the array degraded). This
> > allows the events_cleared to reflect a clean->dirty transition last
> > occurred before the array became degraded. My reasoning is: If it was
> > a clean->dirty transition the bitmap still has the associated dirty
> > bit set in the local member's bitmap, so using the bitmap to resync is
> > valid.
> >
> > thanks,
> > Mike
>
> Thanks for persisting. I think I understand what is going on now.
>
> How about this patch? It is similar to your, but instead of depending
> on the odd/even state of the event counter, it directly checks the
> clean/dirty state of the array.
Hi Neil,
Your revised patch works great and is obviously cleaner.
Thanks!
Tested-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...il.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists