linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/18] flag parameters: paccept

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080508225043.0A84026FA85@magilla.localdomain>
Date:	Thu,  8 May 2008 15:50:43 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davidel@...ilserver.org,
	mtk.manpages@...il.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/18] flag parameters: paccept

> Some architectures (including x86) do not implement TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK.

It's now spelled:

       set_restore_sigmask();

For the other syscalls that depend on this (e.g. sys_ppoll),
we just put the whole definition in #ifdef HAVE_SET_RESTORE_SIGMASK.

The few machines that don't have RESTORE_SIGMASK support of some flavor,
also have not assigned numbers to the syscalls that need it.


Thanks,
Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/